A cure for what ails ya'

So, today had some ridiculousness (wouldn't be a day at work if it didn't). Really, it was a simple problem that got blown out of proportion when we couldn't get any one to answer our questions. The one department around here which could have answered our questions easily, was involved in a big afternoon to-do (training, I think), leaving no one in the office to answer the phone with innocent questions (like ours). So, what could have been solved simply with one phone call, became a 11/2 hour ordeal of phone calls and run-around through people who didn't know much, as we tried to get some answers.

And oh, yeah, had a migraine today too, which all of the above nonsense didn't help.

Enter Anne to the rescue! An e-mail of nonsense stuff she's found, including the cutest little guys ever: baby bats! in blankets! Definitely cheered me up no end :)

These poor little guys were orphaned when a poisonous tick outbreak occurred in their colony. They were rescued, but needed to be kept warm, since baby bats cling to their mother and have her body warmth until they are old enough to survive on their own. So, they got bundled up by the rescue workers, to keep they nice and toasty. I particularly love the faces on the two in the middle of the top picture in that article :)

Fruit bats are really important ecologically (yes, the bio background is coming out here!) They important for pollination, like birds or insects. And as a caver, bats are naturally wonderful critters anyway, and fruit bats like these are actually really intelligent (besides being cute!) I've heard them described as about the intelligence level of a cat... Of course, watching Scruffy attack the shadows on the wall, I'm not sure how bright that actually is any more... ;)

Review: We are Marshall

Here's one Anne recommended and Zach wanted to see too, so it got bumped up higher on our list. Actually sat on the shelf once it arrived for about a week, between days when Zach was working odd hours and I was too tired to watch such an emotional movie. But finally, we found the time, so here it is: We are Marshall.

The story is pretty simple with this one, and based on true events. A plane crash in 1970 killed the Marshall University football team, coaching staff and many fans and boosters involved with the program. This movie follows the attempts to reestablish a program the following year: the students' efforts to convince the board to have a program, the president's efforts to find a coaching staff, the coaches' efforts to find players, the player's efforts to win a game.

I really wasn't sure I'd like this one, but I did. I still don't know if it's one I'd watch over and over, but it was a good movie. Several scenes in particular were very well done. The crash, for example, was nicely handled, I felt. No scenes of everyone panicking on the plane, no shots of the actual crash, but nicely edited from scenes on the flight to ones of rescue vehicles and fire trucks and confused, worried citizens hurrying to the site of the crash. Just black and quiet in between. More effective than an overblown Hollywood crash sequence. At least in this humble opinion :) I've been noticing that more and more in movies, how silence and dark scenes and good editing can be so much more effective in creating particular emotions, leaving it all up to our imaginations to fill in the gaps.

And this is an emotional movie. It's a sports movie, but not - more about human spirit and recovery and rising above. Sports is just the setting. Emotional in a good way, but yes, I did get choked up. I read an article by a movie critic once, about "guy chick flicks." You know, those movies that guys watch to be emotional, often (but not necessarily) sports related. I remember "Brian's Song" was one, but I can't remember the others on the list. This was that type of movie. And, silly me, I can't get worked up over chick flicks. Someone dying of cancer, ho hum. Not nearly as big a catch in my throat (if at all) as compared to a guy chick flick. The "Beaches"-type cancer deaths are sad yes, but just not what gets to me. Dunno - maybe it's just me :) But yes, definitely a grab-a-tissue movie.

The acting was hit-or-miss. I think Matthew McConaughey is one of those guys I never quite appreciate fully. He did well here, but just a little over-the-top at times. However, the character was a little eccentric, so maybe that's why he just struck me as odd sometimes. The coach had to be eccentric though - putting himself in that position, coaching at a school he didn't need to be at, in such a devastating environment, simply because he "wanted to help." It was interesting to watch the interviews with the coaching staff in the DVD extras, hear the men's opinions and thoughts on what they entered into. Coach Lengyel did have some good lines though ("Redbook's only gettin' me so far - I need names!") David Strathairn is awesome, as usual. Have loved his work since I first saw him in Sneakers. :) Personally, he needs to do more mainstream work, so I am more able to appreciate it. Matthew Fox I actually liked. I wasn't sure, having never seen "Lost", and didn't know if he was just another hunky face cast in the movie, but he did a good job. Still bothered me that they kept calling him "Red" - yes, I know it was the character's name, but he's definitely a brunette. Another nice performance was Anthony Mackie, playing Nate Ruffin, one of the few surviving members of the 1970 Thundering Herd. Ruffin had been injured, so had not been at the away game from which the crashed plane was returning. Mackie did a great job playing a very difficult role - a lot of survivor's guilt and determination and frustration to portray, and also interestingly, one of the few leads who wasn't able to talk with their real-life inspiration (the real Ruffin died several years ago). A good up-and-coming actor, and here's hoping we see more good work from him in years to come!

Overall, 4 of 5. Very nice handling of a community's uplifting recovery from a devastating tragedy. Definitely a take-a-tissue movie, but a very positive feeling to it. The movie could easily have become overwrought and sappy, but handled things very well. Definitely worth a viewing.

Quizziness continues

Don't know why I find these things so addicting... :)


What Indiana Jones character are you?

Hey, Shorty! You're Indy's street-smart little buddy. You're always watching out for your friends, and if necessary, you'll put yourself in danger to keep them safe. You treat the people you care about with a tremendous amount of respect, but you also have a silly, casual way of speaking, like "Hold on to your potato!" As sidekicks go, you're a really cute, helpful one to have around... and if anyone gets brainwashed, you'll find a way to snap them back to reality.


What Color is your personality?

You are Blue.

You are calm and controlled. You are also very sweet and get along with others well. Sometimes others do not understand why you are so nice and think you have a hidden agenda. If you do...thats too bad, but if you don't you have nothing to worry about!


What 70's Show Character are You?

We're going to be careful how we word this one, because we don't want to end up with your foot up our ass. Hmm... with that in mind, we probably shouldn't call you cranky, critical, or anti-social (even though that might all be true). Yes, you're tough, but it's only because you love your friends and family and you want them to do their best in life. You know how to do pretty much everything, and you do your best to make sure things are done the "right" way -- you hate when people take the lazy way out.

So, the new cat...

is totally insane. I realize as I say this that cats, by nature, are a little nutty, but Scruffy is truly ridiculous. As if one insane pet wasn't enough :)

You doubt me? Well, let me provide evidence...

He meows, but he trills more than he actually makes a 'meow' sound. No picture for that, but it's very interesting to listen to. He has all sorts of inflections in his little trills, too. Not a Siamese's full vocabulary, but his little noises can be begging, disgruntled, contented. When we gave him a bath today, it was mostly disgruntled, though! I keep thinking we should change his name to Trilby, but then I couldn't go around the house saying "Scruffy" in a funny voice :)

And I've never met a more affectionate, underfoot cat (I don't think he believes that hands have any other purpose than to pet the kitty). He has definitely made himself at home in the apartment in a very short time. He's only been here a few weeks, too! The funny thing is, he is a sprawler. When he makes himself at home on the couch or the desk chair or the floor in the doorway, he will SPRAWL, and I mean that in the full sense of the word. Head upside-down, all four feet pointing up in the air. It's really the most ridiculous thing to look at, but he seems so happy!

Then there is his penchant for lounging in unusual areas. Zach walked into the bathroom to brush his teeth, and found the cat stretched out in the bathtub. Apparently the house was too warm for one in a fur coat, and spreading out in the bathtub was a nice way to cool off. It was his look of "Yeah? What'd'ya want?" that really cracked us up, though.

Finally, the other night, we had Joey out and about (who, by the way, could probably take on this cat nearly 3x his size - feisty buns!) Anyway, Scruffy was very interested in Joey's cage. Smells of bunny and Timothy hay - very interesting smells, I suppose. So he decided to go inside to explore. And then settled in on Joey's shelf. The cat, fully 3 times the size of the bunny, was trying to make himself comfortable on the bunny's resting shelf. And it almost looked like he was succeeding, too!

So, yes, the cat is fitting in very well. He's very affectionate, almost to a fault, but he's definitely one of the nuttiest little guys under the sun! Makes for a very entertaining mix here, lemme tell you! :)

WIP Wednesday

With all the craziness at work last week, I didn't get much posting done. I did, however, get a lot of knitting done, trying to escape from the craziness around me! Here's the update for all who are interested:

• Square Cake is off the needles. I've finished the handles and just have to do all the finishing nonsense now: block it, seam the bottom, weave in all ends, add the lining. I hate finishing, particularly weaving in ends. Still, it'll be interesting to see how quickly the wet cotton dries out here in the desert, especially compared to I Do (same yarn) taking forever to dry in rainy VA in December! :)
  
• The baby blanket continues! I'm actually off the DPNs now, and onto a large circular needle. As a friend pointed out, I probably should have used this as an opportunity to learn how to use 2 circular needles (like a lot of people do with socks), but I was so eager to cast on, I didn't want to have to wait for a new needle to arrive, learn a new technique... all sorts of things that would delay me from starting the new project. :) I'm definitely a bad casting-on addict, particularly when it's a special project!

And, not an actual project, but still knitting news: I joined the Ravelympics! I'm all set up for knitting during the Olympics now, along with hundreds of other knitters around the world :) For those who don't know, the knitting Olympics started about an Olympics or two ago as knitters gathered in front of their TVs for 2 weeks and (I believe stirred on by The Knitting Harlot), decided to challenge themselves as the athletes were challenging themselves. Well, vaguely along the same lines of a challenge, at least :) A project is to be cast on during the opening ceremonies, it is to be a challenge to the knitter (not just the same ol' hat you make all the time), and the goal is to finish by the end of the closing ceremonies. Swatching before the Games begin is allowed: it is considered "training" ;) A group on Ravelry has taken this on, and thus, the 2008 Ravelympics is soon to be underway! They've divided the Knitting Olympics into "events" as well, so that knitters can have forums to chat with other knitters challenging themselves with similar projects. Some examples: Amigurumi'n'Toy Toss, Sock Put, Sweater Sprint, Lace Javelin, and so forth. What can I say - knitters are silly people :) I have decided to be a Triknithlete, and tackle 3 events. They are:

• Scarf Stroke - am going to take on Liesel. I've had a skein of Cara Mia waiting for this particular project, just languishing in my stash, and now I've a nice reason to kick myself in the butt to make a scarf I've had my eye on. :)
  
• Hat Dash - Odessa, by Grumperina. I've another ball of Cara Mia in the same color which would make a nice matching hat to the scarf above. I'm still deciding if I'm going to add the pearly beads in it. Since opening ceremonies aren't for another few weeks, I still have some time to figure it out.
  
• WIP Wrestling - Time to tackle a sweater that is sooooo close to being done, Salt Peanuts. I was working on that one for a while, and was almost done, when I messed up the shaping along the neck on the last piece I had to make. I was so frustrated with myself (it was a rather silly mistake) that I set it aside and then have been distracted with other projects since. So, again, another reason to kick myself in the bum and finish what I started - actually tink what I messed up, and rework it correctly. It's so close, and all I need is that little push of motivation.

Oh, and another bit of knitter silliness with the Ravelympics - teams! No real competition between the teams, and people can compete on more than one, but it still adds to the fun. Personally, I'm on Team Robonia. Hail, hail Robonia! A Land I didn't make up! :D

Review: Hoodwinked

This was one Zach had picked up for us. He'd seen it long before I had, and said we had to get it. Usually it's the other way 'round in this house. Finally got time to give a whirl the other night, and here ya' go: Hoodwinked.

Like most animated movies that Hollywood releases, it was impossible to escape trailers for it. Still, it was a couple years ago, so to review, this is one of the fairy-tale-with-a-twist movies. This time, the story of Little Red Riding Hood is reinvented as a crime caper. An assortment of furry detectives are interviewing the familiar characters, to determine what actually happened in a domestic disturbance call. As the conflicting tales unwind, it looks like this break-in could be connected with the Goody Bandit currently at large in the Woods! So, who will the culprit turn out to be?

Admittedly, as both an animation and a fairy-tale junkie, I watch a lot of these sort of movies, and want to rate them highly. There were things that irritated me with this one, but overall, I really liked it. Definitely a fun family movie, but with tons of visual and side jokes for adults to enjoy as well. Look closely for a group of moles dressed as the Village People, for example. The characters are new for this particular fairy tale, but are rather stereotypical from this genre. The rebellious, hard-core granny, the young girl who wants to see the world, etc. Still, there are some new twists in the story, and some very clever writing that makes it an enjoyable film, even if you don't have kids. Good for the young and the young at heart, as the cliche goes :)

Voice acting: awesome. Patrick Warburton is one of my favorite voices, period. Not one of the prettiest, just-read-the-phone-book-to-me-and-I'm-happy voices, but so good nonetheless. So dry and deadpan, delivering some of the funniest lines in whatever show he's in. For those that don't know, he's Kronk in Emperor's New Groove ("My spinach poofs!") and he's Joe Swanson in Family Guy ("Let's WASSSAIL!!"). He was the Wolf in this one. Anne Hathaway is Red, and I'm more and more impressed with her as a representative of the actresses of my age. There are so many others in the early 20s that are sadly disappointing. And this isn't her first voice work, either; she was the lead in a Studio Ghibli movie, The Cat Returns. Good taste in roles, not that I'm biased or anything :) Glenn Close (Granny) and David Ogden Stiers (Nicky Flippers, the froggy detective) are both classy voices too.

The biggest downside was the animation. This was well done, certainly better than the CG cartoons on Saturday morning (some of which REALLY grate on me aesthetically) but not in the same league as Pixar or Dreamworks (Shrek films). Still good animation, but lacking a lot of the detail and smoothness of the other studios.

And yes, I looked it up. If you've seen Over the Hedge, they have another hyper squirrel character who saves the day drinking coffee and moving at hyper speed. This one came out a year before Over the Hedge. Just in case you care (I was curious myself) ;)

Overall: 4 of 5. Very cleverly written, and great characters. A lot of stereotypical characters, mind you, but treated in such a fun way that it's enjoyable. The animation is only par, but the writing definitely makes it worth the watch.

SPOILER:

Andy Dick is wonderfully cast as the insane culprit. His voice always has that "I'm cute and adorable and mostly insane" sort of sound to it. Perfect for the Goody Bandit. Remember, "never trust a bunny!"

It never rains, but it pours

So true in so many ways out here.

When the desert gets actual rain (not the ten drops, will-it-won't-it sort of rain), it easily turns in to flash floods. We had a storm a couple weeks ago, with flash floods washing out roads all through the area. Knocked out power here, too.. and in the few neighboring towns... and along the nearby Interstate for several miles. Yeah, it was a nasty one. Never want to be without power for 16 hrs again, in the desert, in July. Pretty rough day that was!

That saying's also true in my life right now. Part of why no posts this week. Work has been NUTS. Things breaking all over the facility. The lady at the Work Order desk must have gotten sick of my voice this week. "You again!?" " (sigh) Yeah, something new this time" I think I turned in more work orders this past week, than in any one given week since I started here in the spring.

Meanwhile, as the facility was breaking away in bits around us, people started going absolutely nutty. I swear, people get stupid when it's this hot. Patience and even tempers fly right out the window! We had patrons at the facility yelling at staff unprovoked, complaining no end. But, then the heat-craziness hit staff too. Staff getting stressed to the point of tears, threatening to quit, turning simple oversights or carelessness on the part of other staff into gigantic personal slights. Yes, we're a busy facility now, and yes, things are more stressful than they are during calmer seasons, but I'm tellin' ya - heat makes people irrational and angry!

Then, to cap off the week, our facility had to be shut all weekend when our equipment broke down. Pretty much the one piece that keeps us running smoothly decided Friday afternoon would be a great time to kick the bucket. Not in the fall, when we're scheduled to be closed for maintenance anyway. No, no. Now, when we're busy. Of course.

Yeah, it was a fun week.

Oh, and in the midst of all this, I was sick, with a medicine that made me even sicker. Yes, it made me healthy again, but the side effects were not fun. The sort of ones that aren't enough to change medicines, but enough to make you decidedly uncomfortable. Remember, a week of constant, low-level nausea and exhaustion makes any stressful work week more enjoyable!

So, yes - it never rains but it pours. Flash floods outside, stressful work week inside. Ben says it's because I'm embracing my new environment's philosophy in all aspects of my life. I say I'm counting down the days til we're living in a rational climate again!! :)

Review: The Graduate

Another classic on the "must see" list, at least according to most critics. So, we added it to the list and watched it when it came recently. So, here ya' go: my thoughts on The Graduate.

Everyone knows the basic plot. 21-year-old Benjamin Braddock, an upper-middle-class college graduate, adrift after leaving college. Trying to find meaning in his future, he drifts into a affair with a married woman (one of his parent's friends). Meanwhile, to complicate things, he meets and falls in love with her daughter. The movie was tremendously successful, striking a nerve with disenchanted youthful audiences, and launched Hoffman's career.

I can see why this was a career-making movie for Hoffman. It was only his second film, and he apparently beat out Warren Beatty, Robert Redford and Charles Grodin for the role. After seeing him in the role, however, it's hard to picture anyone else playing Ben Braddock. He's a little creepy when he's trying to follow Elaine back at Berkely, but I really liked the earlier scenes as he's drifiting after college, floating in the pool, etc. A recent graduate myself, I definitely remember that aimless, what-do-I-do-now feeling. It's definitely understandable why this movie struck such a chord.

This is definitely one of those movies with multiple layers. The young man finding himself adrift, caught between the older generation and the newer - in women, jobs, mores. The type of movie that term papers are written on. I can understand why it's on so many To See lists.

The directing was great in this movie, and the editing was awesome. I loved the way scenes blended into each other while he was drifting before meeting Elaine, and my all time favorite scene was his discussion with her at the doorway of her class, both before and after class. That one merited an out-loud laugh. Very nicely done :) So many good lines too. "Plastics." "Mrs. Robinson, you're trying to seduce me... aren't you?" And the music... well, I just like Simon & Garfunkel anyway, but it was very nicely used here.

I think what I didn't like most was the ending, and I think that's what kept me from giving this movie more stars. Without giving anything away, I thought the resolution to the story was very silly. Still, the final scene on the bus, paralleling the beginning scene on the plane, was very nicely done - how he's come so far, and still hasn't gotten anywhere. Like I said, the directing was great in this movie.

Overall: 3 of 5. I liked the movie, and related a lot to Dustin Hoffman's character, at least in the at-loose-ends situation. However, I did find him a little bit odd, and thought the ending of the movie was downright silly. I'm glad I watched it, and understand a lot of the Mrs. Robinson references now. Still, I don't feel the need to have it on my shelf.

N is for...

New Arrival!

My World, meet Scruffy, the newest member of our household.

Zach and I have both grown up with cats, and as much as I love Joey, we were missing having a cat around, Zach especially. Being allergic to hay, he's not as close to the bunny, and missed having the mellow, lets-you-pick-them-up-however-you-want sort of pet. Apparently two of his cats growing up were REALLY mellow, and he missed having that sort of fuzziness wandering 'round the house.

So, yesterday we went over to the shelter here, where a friend works as a vet tech, and took a look at the cats and kittens there waiting to be adopted. Zach had been really wanting a kitten, and especially an orange one (he's had good luck with sweet orange cats), As luck would have it, there was an orange kitten there. And in the cage above it was Scruffy. Not love at first sight, and as we were meeting all the cats there, the kitten remained a possibility. But as we were putting the kitten back up, Scruffy wanted to play. So we took him out to meet him too. Big solid cat, good strong neck (wouldn't be surprised if he's got some Maine Coon in him, looking at his size) and I've never met a cat more wanting to be loved! So, we debated on it, and decided that as cute as the kitten was, he would be easily adopted, but Scruffy is older (2 yrs) and so sweet and friendly that he really needed a home. So we brought him into ours!

He's definitely an affectionate cat. His whole first afternoon, he was practically underfoot, wanting to know where I was, begging for pets. If I was in another room and he couldn't find me right away, you could hear him calling for me. And though he's not a Siamese, he's still chatty enough that I don't just look at him and guffaw. Growing up with a pair of Siamese, all I can do is laugh at "those whimpy little mew kittens." We'll introduce him to Joey slowly, to give the two boys a chance to get used to each other. From people I've talked to online and from what I've read, cats and bunnies can get along well, so that's what we're hoping for. We'll give them a chance to meet gradually and be well-supervised, at least until they get used to each other.

I always like naming pets, but in this case, I can deal with Scruffy as a name. Funny thing is, he's not scruffy at all! Very shed-y though. And honestly, all I can hear when I say the name is the janitor's voice on Futurama (also named Scruffy, for those who don't watch the show). "Scruffy knows!" Makes me laugh, so we'll keep his name as-is, even if it doesn't really apply to him anymore :)

WIP Wednesday, a little belated

Zach had normal hours yesterday at work, so I didn't get a chance to hop on the computer. So, the Wednesday knitting update is coming on Thursday instead :)

Biggest news? The baby blanket, of course! As Zach said upon looking at the work in progress, "Such tiny stitches - That's gonna be a lot of work!"

But, that's also why I'm starting in July for a baby due in October! I'm making progress, too. Granted, like any baby blanket, the beginning will just fly along, and then you hit the slog-fest of the biggest portions of the blanket, or just the feeling that the same width blanket never seems to get any longer. The last baby blanket I did was like that. It was that standard baby blanket pattern, started at one corner then increased at each end until you reach the diagonal of the blanket, then decreased at each row until you end at the opposite corner of where you started. It's a great pattern, very simple to remember. The beginning and the end go very quickly, since you're at the narrower corners, but man! The middle of that blanket, working across the widest part, seemed like it would never end! Of course, I did have to remind myself regularly, that I had over a 4 ft length of stitches on my needles, since the blanket itself was 3 ft along each side. So of course those rows would take a while!

Anyway, this blanket is moving along well too. I'm at about 9 inches across (diameter) right now. It'll be about 3 feet across when it's done, I think. That seems to be a standard size for baby blankets. So, yes, a long way to go, but I'm starting early to give myself plenty of time! :)

Review: Troy

So, happy belated 4th of July to all you folks out there. Hope it was fun for you. Zach and I went camping over in Mojave National Park. Yes, we're the crazy people who went camping in the desert in July, but it really wasn't as bad as all that (actually cooler than here on post, since it's at a higher elevation!). Once again, I have pictures forthcoming of our fun trip. I should be getting them up this week, along with the pictures from Vegas a few weeks ago. Zach's working late this week, so I actually get time on the computer all to myself, without anyone pestering! Huzzah!

Anyway, since it's Movie Monday, time for the What We're Watching list to be updated :) So, after a string of some pretty good movies, we had one that was only OK. This week's movie: Troy.

According to the blurb on Netflix, the movie is based on the Illiad. You all know the story - Trojan War, epic heroes, Odysseus and his wooden horse, Achilles and his snit with Agamemnon, and that whole heel thing. Calling the movie "based on" the Illiad would be a stretch - "inspired by" is probably better terminology.

The casting was pretty well done. Orlando Bloom can strike me as too much of a pretty boy sometimes, but here he played Paris. Pretty Boy is called for. Brian Cox was Agamemnon, and let's face it - I've loved his voice since the Sharpe's series on BBC. The whole suppressed power, sort of purring voice. The kind of voice you just let read - give him a phone book, a dictionary, whatever. That kind of voice. Even better in a soft Irish accent, a la his character in Sharpe's, but unfortunately, Irish was not called for here. :( Peter O'Toole was Priam - very nice in the pained, dignified old monarch role. Sean Bean was Odysseus (Ulysses on the Netflix DVD slip - VERY WRONG!! That's the Roman name!!!!!! Yes I am a dork...) That casting made me happy. I like Sean Bean (again, since the Sharpe's series), and somehow he ends up getting cast as a villain a lot in American movies - National Treasure, Patriot Games, even in Fellowship of the Ring he was Boromir! Seeing him as a beloved good guy was a nice change. The actor that surprised me was Eric Bana, playing Hector. He was actually very much as I would have pictured Hector - a little brooding, responsible, dutiful, heroic, kind... Good choice there.

My biggest gripe with the cast was Brad Pitt as Achilles. He just grated on me for some reason. I realize that Achilles is in a snit through most of the story anyway, but even before the war started, in the preliminary scenes, Achilles just squinted and pouted and killed people in battle. Maybe Brad Pitt is one of those actors who just don't work in period pieces. You know, those actors that look wonderful in certain eras (mostly 20th century), but put them in say, Jane Austen's England, or Ancient Greece, or Tudor England, and it just doesn't work. They just belong in a certain setting and it doesn't work for them otherwise. Maybe that's why I didn't like him in it - too modern-American sounding and acting to gel with the ancient battle. At any rate, he was definitely the one that didn't seem to fit as well in the setting. Oh, and Helen definitely wasn't pretty enough to launch a thousand ships. Pretty, yes, but not as beautiful as she could have been - personally, Andromache was prettier.

The directing was alright. There were some things that were very nicely handled, and some that irked me. The music choice got a little old after a while. The director really like the wailing wordless mournful female-voiced songs in the background. It was very effective in the sacking of Troy scenes, but it needs to be used a bit more sparingly than what was done here. As far as the filming went, it was beautifully shot. Nice and epic, and the CG effects were not overpowering.

My biggest gripe overall was playing fast and loose with the original mythology!! I do like some movies that play with the mythology (Clash of the Titans, Disney's Hercules), but even in those, the major discrepancies irk me. I know that may sound very silly, but I took 6 years of Latin, and have always loved mythology. Must have been that little series of books we had on our shelves as kids, covering a bunch of the Greco-Roman myths. The stories are so good to begin with - they've lasted for 1000s of years, for crying out loud! They don't need Hollywood's re-editing to make them 'more entertaining.'

Some of my grievances with their separation from the original material are smaller, but some are major. For instance... THE TROJAN WAR WAS 10 YEARS!!!! It was a frickin' siege! The Illiad begins after 9 years of besieging the city of Troy. In the movie, the war seems to last about 3 weeks, from the landing on the beaches to the wooden horse and the sacking of Troy. I realize that filming a 9 year siege isn't possible for the filming or for keeping audiences entertained, but some little note at the bottom of the screen would have been nice.

Some of the more minor grievances...

• Aeneas (who makes a brief appearance during the sacking of Troy scenes) was about 18, a youth. In the Aeneid, he's in his 30s or early 40s - his SON was a youth. He's mentioned as one of the heroes who fought valiantly during the battles, and the teenager who made his cameo in Troy was certainly not old enough to be fighting. At least they got that he was helping his father escape too...
• Menelaus does not die at Troy, but returns to Sparta with Helen. A nice movie scene (particularly emphasizing how much a coward Paris was, which is accurate) but still, he didn't die.
  
• Agamemnon did not die in Troy. I know that makes for a nice just-rewards scene in the movie, but really, he did make it home from Troy (where he was killed by his wife and her lover, but that's another story).
• Achilles did not die during the sacking of Troy, but in battle before the wooden horse was built. There was actually another tiff amongst the Greeks over who would get his armor and shield. He was indeed killed by Paris, and the whole arrow-in-the-heel story, but there was no running through the streets looking for Briseis, no Paris killing Achilles in front of her, etc. Again, makes for good movie, but irks the classicist.
  
• Likewise, if Achilles died before Troy was sacked, so did Paris.... except in this movie. I always particularly liked Paris' death, as it seemed he deserved it so much, for all the trouble he caused. In case you didn't know, he was shot by a poisoned arrow, then tried to go back to his wife, a nymph, who had medicine to cure it. Because he had abandoned her to run off with Helen (and then forgot her for 10 years until he needed her again), she refused, and so he died. Frankly, he deserved it. But, killing Orlando Bloom as a shmuck on-screen probably wouldn't have gone over too well with the fangirl population.
• I did like the Trojan horse. Very ominous and foreboding looking (made from the black wood of the ships). However, I missed Laocoon getting crushed by the serpents sent by Athena because he doubted that the horse was genuine. The movie overall, avoided the gods-and-goddesses aspect of the story. That's alright, I suppose - just a different interpretation of the story (also keeps it a bit simpler for the big screen). I missed some of those aspects, like why Achilles was invincible, but it wasn't as distracting to me as the 9 years of siege being glossed over.
  

Anyhoo... overall, I'd say maybe 2.5 of 5. It wasn't a bad movie, and most of the cast was really good. It was beautifully filmed, nice and beautifully epic. Really, it was the fast-and-loose mythology that put me off the most. Some stories don't need Hollywood-ification to make them acceptable. Frankly, I'm the type of person who likes books, and likes movies, and likes movies based on books. I like seeing characters I love in my head come to life on screen. However, when a movie is made of a beloved story, there are a few criteria to be met in order to keep me happy. The movie must stand alone (I shouldn't have to have read the book recently to understand what's going on in the movie) but it should still reflect the original material. Some good examples: Lord of the Rings, Princess Bride, Pride and Prejudice (the A&E/BBC Colin Firth version). This one stands alone, but strays too much from the original material for me to be happy.

WIP Wednesday!

Hey, I actually remembered this week! :)

Three projects to talk about this week, all in different stages of progress:

Finished the first June dishcloth (I seem to be running about a dishcloth behind, but I'm kinda keeping up!) It is a palm tree, good summery image, but all I could do was laugh. Amy, this one's for us!! After living in SC, you either love or hate the palm tree. Why, you may ask. Well, the state tree/mascot/iconic image is the palmetto. It's EVERYWHERE!!!!!!! Every 3rd car has a palmetto & moon sticker of some sort (and, in the Upstate where I used to live, also about 6 pieces of Clemson paraphernalia). You can't escape it, and odds are (especially for non-native South Carolinians like Amy and myself) you will get sick of it. As soon as I saw the pattern, I decided to send it to Julie with the baby blanket, as a baby's washcloth. They live in FL, so they'll appreciate the palm tree, and they just moved there, so they aren't sick of it yet :)

Speaking of the baby blanket, MY YARN CAME!!! :) I'm casting on tonight, so it will officially be a WIP by the time I go to bed today!

Finally, one project still on the needles, Square Cake has another handle done (I'm on number 3 now). I hope it will be done next week by the time I post again (at least the knitting part - no guarantee on the lining part), but I think that might be a little optimistic. With the holiday weekend (We're going camping! In the desert!) and the excitement over the new project, Square Cake might need to wait a little longer before it's finished :)

Review: Ratatouille

So, this didn't get posted yesterday (on Movie Monday), because I was busy and Zach was breaking in a new game on the computer. The computer, by the way, is also brand new, to replace the old laptop whose hard-drive crashed. So bear with us as we get this new one up and running (we're still downloading and installing a lot of stuff on the new machine).

Anyhoo...

We watched Ratatouille this weekend! Yay Pixar!

If you didn't know the story already (surprising, as it was a well-marketed Disney movie, but just in case), Ratatouille is a tale of a young rat (Remy), blessed with an exceptional sense of taste and smell, who dreams of being more than a thief and muncher of garbage, as a rat is destined to be. He wants to be a chef! Fate smiles upon young Remy when he meets Linguini, a hopeless in the kitchen, who happens to be working in the kitchen of a (formerly) five star restaurant.

For years now, Pixar has been raising the bar in computer animation, and in animation in general. You watch these characters, and the world they live in is so rich and detailed. Fog on the Seine, or Paris lights in the background, or the Rose window at Notre Dame... so many touches that enhance the movie so beautifully. Or raindrops on the river, looking almost real. And the characters' facial expressions are priceless!! I really liked that Remy and Linguini communicate, but never talk. So much more is handled through their facial expressions and body language

Pixar's writing is classic, always a nice blend of jokes the adults get, and ones for the kids. A lot of nice subtle visual effects too. For example, Anton Ego (a villain of sorts) is a food critic reviewing the restaurant. He's known as the Grim Eater because of his restaurant-breaking reviews - take a look at his study as they first show him. So many clever little touches!

The voice actors in this are great. Anton Ego is Peter O'Toole, for crying out loud!! And Colette is Jeanine Garoafalo, a favorite of mine for playing cute-but-tough little spitfire characters. And Patton Oswalt, the voice of Remy, is a W&M grad (Tribe Pride!!). Neither here nor there, but I liked the trivia :)

Don't forget, if you're watching the DVD, to watch the extras. The Pixar short on this one ("Lifted") is hysterical. Once again, no talking but so much said with body language. Anyone who's ever had a performance review or taken a driver's exam will appreciate this one. My all-time favorite is still "Birds on a Wire", but that's because I know those birds!! Also on the DVD is the short, "Your Friend the Rat" hosted by Remy and his insatiable brother Emile. A hysterical history of ratkind-mankind interactions.

Overall, definitely a 5 of 5. Pixar has yet to have a miss, at least in my book (well, I haven't seen Cars yet, but it's on the Netflix list, so eventually I will!) Great characters, beautiful animation, clever writing. Two thumbs up all around. I want to see Wall-E now that it's out too, but we need to find a better theater than the one in Victorville. (sigh) the trials of living in the middle of nowhere!